In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8320 is faster than the Ryzen 5 7600X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $89 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 50% cheaper – $88.10 vs $177.00
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.44 vs $1.04/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 5 7600X
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Ryzen 5 7600X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
169 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$177
49%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
42%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
