In Rust, the FX-8320 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $127 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 59% cheaper – $88.10 vs $214.99
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Rust – $0.41 vs $0.77/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 279 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
210 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
46%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
279 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
40%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
53%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
