In Rust, the FX-8320 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $142 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 62% cheaper – $88.10 vs $229.89
- Up to 62% cheaper
- Up to 49% better value in Rust – $0.42 vs $0.82/FPS
- Up to 49% better value in Rust
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 279 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
46%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
279 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
38%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
51%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
