In Cyberpunk 2077, the FX-8320 is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $363 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 80% cheaper – $88.10 vs $450.88
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Cyberpunk 2077 – $0.72 vs $3.31/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Cyberpunk 2077
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 11% faster in Cyberpunk 2077 – 136 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Cyberpunk 2077
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Cyberpunk 2077 FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
122 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
67 FPS
76%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
100%
Price, $
$450.88
19%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
