In Atomfall, the FX-8320 is slower than the Core i9-13900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $461 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 84% cheaper – $88.10 vs $549.00
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 79% better value in Atomfall – $0.46 vs $2.23/FPS
- Up to 79% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
77%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
16%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
21%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
