In Atomfall, the FX-8320 is slower than the Core i3-13100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320
No clear advantages
Core i3-13100
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 227 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 60 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core i3-13100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
82%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i3-13100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i3-13100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-13100 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $169.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
