In Battlefield V, the FX-8320 is slightly slower than the Core i3-13100. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $52 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 37% cheaper – $88.10 vs $139.99
- Up to 37% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in Battlefield V – $0.40 vs $0.55/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in Battlefield V
Core i3-13100
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield V – 251 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield V
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 60 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Battlefield V FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core i3-13100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
81%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
62%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
73%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i3-13100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i3-13100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-13100 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $169.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 60W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
