In Deathloop, the FX-8150 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 3400G and it's also a better value for money, as it's $37 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 42% cheaper – $51.29 vs $88.00
- Up to 42% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in Deathloop – $0.23 vs $0.40/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in Deathloop
Ryzen 5 3400G
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Ryzen 5 3400G: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$88
58%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
57%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3400G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $149.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM4 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
