In Deathloop, the FX-8150 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $179 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 78% cheaper – $51.29 vs $229.89
- Up to 78% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in Deathloop – $0.23 vs $0.94/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in Deathloop
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 13 years and 12 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 13 years and 12 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
222 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
92%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
22%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
24%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
