In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8150 is faster than the Core i9-12900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $238 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 82% cheaper – $51.29 vs $289.00
- Up to 82% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.25 vs $1.71/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i9-12900K
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
169 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
84%
Price, $
$289
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
15%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
