In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8150 is faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $317 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 86% cheaper – $51.29 vs $368.59
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.26 vs $2.15/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 9 9900X
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 120 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Ryzen 9 9900X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
196 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
171 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
87%
Price, $
$368.59
13%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 9 9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 9 9900X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Aug 15th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
