Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3758 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8150 - 454 vs 370 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than FX-8150 - $76.80 vs $82.02
- Up to 23% better value when playing Battlefield IV than FX-8150 - $0.17 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 58 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
454
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |