Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - $82.02 vs $293.00
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 7 7700X - $0.40 vs $1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 41% better in Battlefield V than FX-8150 - 291 vs 207 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for $293 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |