In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-6350 is faster than the Core Ultra 9 285 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $512 cheaper!
FX-6350
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 91% cheaper – $51.29 vs $563.41
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 92% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.25 vs $3.31/FPS
- Up to 92% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core Ultra 9 285
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$563.41
9%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
8%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
