In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-6350 is faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $339 cheaper!
FX-6350
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 87% cheaper – $51.29 vs $389.95
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.25 vs $2.28/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 9 9900X
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 120 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Ryzen 9 9900X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
171 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
85%
Price, $
$389.95
13%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Ryzen 9 9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Ryzen 9 9900X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 15th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
