In Atomfall, the FX-6100 is slower than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $103 cheaper!
FX-6100
- Up to 75% cheaper – $33.90 vs $136.46
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in Atomfall – $0.18 vs $0.59/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in Atomfall
Core i3-14100
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 229 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 60 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 37% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-6100 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
187 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
81%
Price, $
$33.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.46
24%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
31%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6100 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6100 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
