In Tom Clancy's The Division 2, the FX-6100 is much slower than the Core i3-14100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $115 cheaper!
FX-6100
- Up to 77% cheaper – $33.90 vs $149.35
- Up to 77% cheaper
Core i3-14100
- Up to 11000% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2 – 111 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 11000% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 96% better value in Tom Clancy's The Division 2 – $1.34 vs $33.90/FPS
- Up to 96% better value in Tom Clancy's The Division 2
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 60 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 37% less energy
Tom Clancy's The Division 2 FPS Calculator
FX-6100 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
111 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
22%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6100 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6100 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
