The FX-6100 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G6900 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $20.34 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 41% cheaper – $29.65 vs $49.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
FX-6100 vs Celeron G6900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$49.99
59%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
65%
FX-6100 vs Celeron G6900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6100 vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6100 vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $52.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
