The Celeron G6900 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4300 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $1.97 more expensive!
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the FX-4300
- Up to 4% cheaper – $48.02 vs $49.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G6900 vs FX-4300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$49.99
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Celeron G6900 vs FX-4300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G6900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$52.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |