In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-4350 is faster than the Core Ultra 9 285 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $481 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 85% cheaper – $82.71 vs $563.41
- Up to 85% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.41 vs $3.31/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core Ultra 9 285
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
86%
Price, $
$563.41
14%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
