In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-4350 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $486 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 85% cheaper – $82.71 vs $569.00
- Up to 85% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.41 vs $3.25/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 120 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
175 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
89%
Price, $
$569
14%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
13%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
