In Rust, the FX-4350 is slower than the Core i7-13700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $427 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Up to 84% cheaper – $82.71 vs $509.86
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 79% better value in Rust – $0.39 vs $1.84/FPS
- Up to 79% better value in Rust
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 32% faster in Rust – 276 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
209 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
45%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
276 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
100%
Price, $
$509.86
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
21%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
