In Rust, the FX-4350 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 5 9600X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $111 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Up to 57% cheaper – $82.71 vs $194.00
- Up to 57% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in Rust – $0.39 vs $0.67/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in Rust
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Up to 37% faster in Rust – 287 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
209 FPS
73%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
42%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
287 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
96 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
42%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
58%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
