In Deathloop, the FX-4300 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $187 cheaper!
FX-4300
- Up to 81% cheaper – $42.94 vs $229.89
- Up to 81% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Deathloop – $0.19 vs $0.94/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
92%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
18%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
20%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
4 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
