In Deathloop, the FX-4300 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 9600X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $151 cheaper!
FX-4300
- Up to 78% cheaper – $42.94 vs $194.00
- Up to 78% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in Deathloop – $0.19 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in Deathloop
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 246 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
90%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
22%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
24%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Aug 8th, 2024 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
