Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3356 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of FX-4130
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $84.01 vs $143.81
- Up to 30% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-12600KF - $0.76 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than FX-4130 - 133 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $84.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7297 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
70%
Price, $
$143.81
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7297 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4130 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |