The EPYC 7502 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10980XE and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $361.88 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7502
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 36 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-10980XE
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 40% cheaper – $533.12 vs $895.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 165 vs 180 Watts
EPYC 7502 vs Core i9-10980XE
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10980XE
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
205
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
$533.12
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
100%
EPYC 7502 vs Core i9-10980XE in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7502 vs Core i9-10980XE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7502 vs Core i9-10980XE in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7502
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-10980XE
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
18-core
56%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7502 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10980XE |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1,076.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Rome | Codename | Cascade Lake-X |
180 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 18 |
64 | Threads | 36 |
2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 24.75 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |