Skip to main content
CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Core Ultra 9 285 vs EPYC 7502

The Core Ultra 9 285 is faster than the EPYC 7502 on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

HowManyFPS Team · Prices updated · FPS from real gameplay sessions · Browse benchmarks

  • Up to 23% faster on average across 100+ games
  • Is 5 years and 7 months newer
  • Available for $579

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Similar overall gaming performance.

Coreshelp

EPYC 7502 has 8 more cores.

Threadshelp

EPYC 7502 has 40 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp
AMD EPYC 7502 Logo
EPYC 7502
128 MB

EPYC 7502 has 92 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp
AMD EPYC 7502 Logo
EPYC 7502
2.5 GHz
Turbo Frequencyhelp
AMD EPYC 7502 Logo
EPYC 7502
3.35 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285 boosts 67% higher.

TDPhelp

Core Ultra 9 285 draws 115W less power.

Pricehelp
AMD EPYC 7502 Logo
EPYC 7502
$825.00
LGA1851
Sockethelp
SP3
Arrow Lake-S
Codenamehelp
Rome
Desktop
Segmenthelp
Server/Workstation
Arc Graphics 4 Xe LPG
Integrated GPUhelp
No Integrated Graphics
6400 MHz (DDR5)
RAMhelp
3200 MHz (DDR4)
Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core Ultra 9 285 or EPYC 7502?expand_more
Neither, they're within 1% of each other across 100+ games. Pick based on price, availability, or platform compatibility.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core Ultra 9 285 or EPYC 7502?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285 worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 63/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Core Ultra 9 285 and EPYC 7502?expand_more
Performance: Core Ultra 9 285 scores 63/100, EPYC 7502 scores 63/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Core Ultra 9 285 or EPYC 7502 bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core Ultra 9 285 or EPYC 7502?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285 is the stronger pick at 63/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Popular Comparisons

Why Is My PC Slow?

Join thousands of gamers already benchmarking their rigs.

Download HowManyFPS

Windows 10/11, under 50 MB, always free

Spot BottlenecksBoost FPS100+ Games