Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms EPYC 7402 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1254 days newer than EPYC 7402.
Advantages of EPYC 7402
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 48 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Rocket League than EPYC 7402 - 816 vs 690 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD EPYC 7402 - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7402 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
EPYC 7402
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7402 | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 24 | Cores | 24 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 150 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
