Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms EPYC 7402 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7402.
Advantages of EPYC 7402
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 48 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Monster Hunter: World than EPYC 7402 - 284 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD EPYC 7402 - 170 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7402 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
284
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$348.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $348.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 305 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7402 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
48 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 170 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |