EPYC 7302P vs Core i9-13900K in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The EPYC 7302P is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7302P
The Core i9-13900K is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-13900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 125 vs 155 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
EPYC 7302P
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
197
82%
Min 1% FPS
135
83%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
241
100%
Min 1% FPS
163
100%
Price, $
$499
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7302P vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7302P vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7302P
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
57%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
EPYC 7302P | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $589.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| 155 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
