The EPYC 7302P is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of the Core Ultra 9 285K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 125 vs 155 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 7302P vs Core Ultra 9 285K
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7302P
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
197
79%
Min 1% FPS
135
80%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248
100%
Min 1% FPS
168
100%
Price, $
$529.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7302P vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7302P vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7302P
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
58%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
50%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7302P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $589.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1851 |
| Rome | Codename | Arrow Lake-S |
| 155 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.7 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR5 @ 6400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
