In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-14900KF is slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-14900KF
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 205 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900KF vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
170 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
82%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.52/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900KF vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900KF vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
56%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
19%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 17th, 2023 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $564.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
