In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-620M is faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Is 14 years and 11 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
175 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
87%
Price, $
$569
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
3%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
19%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$332.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
