Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-13700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-13700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-13700F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-13700F - 265 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $269.79 vs $416.96
- Up to 34% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-14900KF - $1.04 vs $1.57 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
265
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
66%
Price, $
$416.96
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $416.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6230 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
259
98%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $269.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6230 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |