Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 651 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-12700F - 234 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $235.99 vs $417.42
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-14900KF - $1.07 vs $1.78 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
60%
Price, $
$417.42
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $417.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
220
94%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |