In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900F is slightly faster than the Core i9-9960X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $639 cheaper!
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 53% cheaper – $559.99 vs $1199.00
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Up to 59% better value in Atomfall – $2.28 vs $5.55/FPS
- Up to 59% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Core i9-9960X
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900F vs Core i9-9960X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
Core i9-9960X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
216 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
88%
Price, $
$1199
46%
Value, $/FPS
$5.55/FPS
41%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i9-9960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i9-9960X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i9-9960X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
22 MB
61%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9960X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$524.00 | MSRP | $1,684.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA2066 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
