In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900F is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $130 more expensive!
Core i9-14900F
- Is 2 months and 22 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 17, 2023
- Is 2 months and 22 days newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Up to 23% cheaper – $429.99 vs $559.99
- Up to 23% cheaper
- Up to 24% better value in Atomfall – $1.73 vs $2.28/FPS
- Up to 24% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900F vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
99%
Price, $
$559.99
76%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
76%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
97%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$524.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
