In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900F is faster than the Core i7-4870HQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jul 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer
Core i7-4870HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-4870HQ: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-4870HQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-4870HQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-4870HQ
Jul 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4870HQ Jul 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jul 1st, 2014 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 47 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 5200 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
