Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i5-10400F - 209 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $74.38 vs $485.00
- Up to 84% better value when playing Control than Core i9-14900F - $0.37 vs $2.32 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 690 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 692 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |