Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1765 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-6700 - 102 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $118.21 vs $149.95
- Up to 14% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-10400F - $1.26 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
86%
Price, $
$149.95
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
94
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$118.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $118.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |