In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900 is faster than the Core i3-6300. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $496 more expensive!
Core i9-14900
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 244 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Core i3-6300
- Up to 87% cheaper – $74.14 vs $569.99
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in Atomfall – $0.36 vs $2.33/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900 vs Core i3-6300: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569.99
13%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
15%
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
204 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
84%
Price, $
$74.14
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900 vs Core i3-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900 vs Core i3-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-6300 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
