In Atomfall, the Core i3-6300 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $155 cheaper!
Core i3-6300
- Up to 68% cheaper – $74.14 vs $229.59
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in Atomfall – $0.36 vs $0.93/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-6300 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
204 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
83%
Price, $
$74.14
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.59
32%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6300 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6300 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
4 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6300 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
