Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900KF - 222 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $292.57 vs $499.99
- Up to 33% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900K - $1.50 vs $2.25 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
67%
Price, $
$499.99
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 448 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
88%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$292.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $292.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 448 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |