The Core i9-13900F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 1700 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only $215.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 57% cheaper – $165.00 vs $380.00
Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen 7 1700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
237
100%
Min 1% FPS
162
100%
Price, $
$380
43%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
52%
Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen 7 1700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen 7 1700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen 7 1700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Ryzen 7 1700
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Raptor Lake-S | Codename | Zen |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
