Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-14700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 369 days older than Core i7-14700.
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 0% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-14700 - 551 vs 550 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700 - 32 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Core i7-14700
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
551
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$405
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1042 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900F | vs | Core i7-14700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 20 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |