The Core i9-13900F is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6300, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $456.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Up to 89% cheaper – $58.02 vs $515.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F vs FX-6300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
216
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, $
$515
11%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
14%
Core i9-13900F vs FX-6300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs FX-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs FX-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$524.00 | MSRP | $132.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |