Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-9920X - 287 vs 245 FPS
Advantages of Core i9-9920X
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $300.15 vs $518.98
- Up to 32% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-13900F - $1.23 vs $1.81 per FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
68%
Price, $
$518.98
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $518.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 324 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
245
85%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$300.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $300.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900F | vs | Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 165 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |