In Control, the Core i9-13900F is slightly faster than the Core i5-10400. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $383 more expensive!
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 254 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
Core i5-10400
- Up to 72% cheaper – $147.00 vs $529.95
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 72% better value in Control – $0.59 vs $2.08/FPS
- Up to 72% better value in Control
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-10400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
27%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
28%
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
249 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-10400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-10400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
