In Control, the Core i9-13900F is same performance as the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $231 more expensive!
Core i9-13900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Up to 44% cheaper – $298.98 vs $529.95
- Up to 44% cheaper
- Up to 44% better value in Control – $1.17 vs $2.08/FPS
- Up to 44% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
56%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
56%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
88%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
83%
L3 Cache
30 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
